![]() ![]() ![]() WTF is this guy talking about, is he seriously saying he has not seen this type of woofer before? What about the Scan-Speak 18W/8535-01, or pretty much the whole Aperion Intimus line, or the Denon SC-39 (which are sort of warmish and me likes). It is way back in the baffle with its own waveguide of sorts." Another thing that caught my eye about the woofer placement is the recessed mounting of the woofer. CR3's have a very delicate exposed dome with no grill, but still inverted the dust cap on the woofer. But I don't think it's for leaks because the whole front baffle is covered by A ONE PIECE PLASTIC.ģ) "The Woofer is about 3.5 inch and appears to a poly cone. This tweeter enclosure is also common in the MRx family (my MR5s have it), and I'm not certain why it's there. ![]() I'm not sure why Mackie would go to the trouble, but I'm guessing it is there to stop air leaks through the front baffle." So it seems to me he kind of pulled that out of his ass.Ģ) "The back of the tweeter is covered by this makeshift enclosure, with staples and hot glue holding it together. I may be wrong, but there was no edge diffraction in the upper treble when I measured the MR5s as far as I could tell. The ring is common to both the CRx and MRx family. So let's start digging into No-audiophile's review ( ) on the similar CR3 commercial entry level 3" woofer speaker which he tends to compare with the LSR305 5" pro entry level 5" woofer speaker (particularly the baffle construction) for whatever reason.ġ) "There is a tiny waveguide built into the plastic baffle cover and a slightly raised ultra green ring for styling and possible edge diffraction in the upper treble" I will caution that I have not heard the CR3s, but their construction is very similar to the MRx's, and found many of No-audiophile's comments a bit off the mark. I feel the MRx speakers are decent (unlike Rock-tits), and are getting a bad rep for questionable reasons. ![]() But I learned recently that Guitar Center is moving the MRx family out of their shelves, and this alarmed me enough to give one shit, though perhaps not two. Furthermore, I tend to find No-audiophile reviews quite on the mark for the most part (except this time). He seems to know his shit.įor the most part I wouldn't say anything. No-audiophile (though anybody that owns these: is proly an audiophile) cleared things up. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |